Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / Books / Law / Professional & Technical

(Download) "Matter John Marsh v. Francis E. Hanley" by Supreme Court of New York * Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Matter John Marsh v. Francis E. Hanley

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Matter John Marsh v. Francis E. Hanley
  • Author : Supreme Court of New York
  • Release Date : January 20, 1975
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 63 KB

Description

[50 A.D.2d 687 Page 687] On this proceeding, petitioner contends that the determination of the Commissioner was arbitrary, capricious and not supported by substantial evidence. In a review of administrative determinations, appellate courts do not review the facts de novo and arrive at an independent determination. Our function is to scrutinize the record and determine whether the decision of the administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence and not arbitrary and capricious (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, 34 N.Y.2d 222). The record indicates that police officers went to the communications division of the police department to investigate the reason why incoming calls to the department were not being answered. On their arrival, they discovered the petitioner, who was the person in charge of such calls, stretched out on several chairs with a pillow under his head. Although the telephones were ringing, he was asleep. Petitioner testified that he had been taking medicine (not a drug) for an ear infection and further testified that, on the night in question, all he remembered was sitting at his duty station and then being awakened by the Deputy Chief. We conclude that on this record there is substantial evidence to support the decision of the commissioner. The petitioner further alleges that the punishment of dismissal was excessive. Such a penalty can only be set aside if it can be said as a matter of law that the sanction imposed * * * was so harsh and excessive, so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's conscience (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, supra, p 239; Matter of Butterly & Green v Lomenzo, 36 N.Y.2d 250). Appellate courts should exercise restraint before intruding into matters involving internal discipline and morale (Matter of Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 N.Y.2d 182, 185). The petitioner was the person in charge of all incoming reports of crimes, requests for ambulances, reports of accidents and all other emergency-type communications. Dismissal for sleeping on duty when one is charged with such a heavy responsibility cannot be said to be irrational or shocking to the [50 A.D.2d 687 Page 688]


PDF Books "Matter John Marsh v. Francis E. Hanley" Online ePub Kindle